Augusta Resource Project
What do we want in our public forest lands?
This? or This?

Breaking News: Open letter to Augusta Resource investors and stockholders: Are you getting a good deal?
Tony Davis from AZ Star: Rosemont seeking $404M in construction loans
EPA writes Army Corps of Engineers on protecting of Davidson Canyon and Cienega Creek outstanding waters
AZ Game and Fish speaks up for our wildlife and environment!
Water depletion map in region of Rosemont supply wells
Letter to Coronado National Forest regarding lack of cooperation with AZ Game and Fish Agency
Game and Fish comments on habitat, wildlife and recreation loss
Game and Fish comments on revenue loss: $1,356,713 over 25 year life of the Rosemont mine
U. S. Department of Interior, Office of Environmental Quality and Compliance, makes extensive comments on the Rosemont project:
Comments on air and water quality concerns
Comments on conservation of Onyx Cave
Freeman's comments on reliability of Augusta's consultant/contractor: SWCA
Video of January 14 hearing event: Rosemont supporters jeer Ron Barber, staff of Congressperson Giffords
Press Release from the Leader of the ANGEL SQUAD: U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords welcomes a determination by the EPA
Freeman's comments at January 14 hearing: Hold the Forest Service personnel responsible for the destruction of 33,000 mature trees
Whitehouse's comprehensive comments on air, water, climate, fire, highway safety and economics
Community compiles a list of cumulative effects of Rosemont Copper Project
List of several administrative problems with the permitting of Rosemont Copper Project
January Calendar of Events for Rosemont permit comments:
Forest Service comment period has been extended!
Jan. 31 (5 pm): End of comment period for Draft Environmental Statement for Forest Service
Comments may be submitted online at: www.RosemontEIS.us
By email at: CoronadoNF@RosemontEIS.us
By phone at : (888) 654-6646
By mail at: Rosemont Comments, P.O. Box 4207, Logan, UT 84323.
www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/documents/DEIS-ExecSummaryVol1.pdf
www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/RosemontDEISmain.htm
Feb. 3: End of Aquifer Protection Permit (ADEQ) comment period (Groundwater)
www.azdeq.gov/cgi-bin/vertical.pl?d=2455916
Breaking News!: Save the Scenic Santa Ritas (SSSR) files securities complaints with SEC! SSSR posted on its website the thousands of pages of public records and publicly available information supporting its complaint to securities regulators in Canada and the United States, along with the formal complaints alleging that Augusta Resource Corporation officers,
Donald Clark and Richard W. Warke,
who apparently failed to disclose required and material information in securities filings.
These documents can be found at:www.scenicsantaritas.org/news/securities-complaint-information
Compilation of excerpts from reports on mineral and financial holdings of Richard W. Warke
Augusta Board Members records and connections
Breaking News!: Rosemont/Augusta Resource tells investors that they have other properties to mine in Pima County—on the West side of the Santa Ritas!!
Facts from the Augusta Resource records:
The properties on the west side of the mountians are called out in the 2007 Rosemont Plan of Operations: “… the Peach-Elgin deposit occupies a klippe floored by a low-angle fault. The Copper World Mine deposit is situated in a complexly faulted sliver of Palaeozoic rocks. The Broadtop Butte deposit is located on the western side of a complex fault system, as is the Rosemont deposit.” (pg. 4) www.augustaresource.com/Theme/Augusta/files/doc_downloads/Final_MPO_071107.pdf
The 2009 ASU Carey School of Business states that the Project is “an open-pit mining operation to be developed on 15,000 acre site” (pg. 1)
www.rosemontcopper.com/assets/files/reports/ASU%20Final%20Report11-09.pdf
From their current Investor Presentation:
Our objective: “Build and operate the world-class Rosemont Mine; Develop a robust portfolio of copper assets in North America; Focus on early stage acquisitions and organic growth… Expected to be the 4 th largest copper mine in the U.S.
www.augustaresource.com/Theme/Augusta/files/doc_presentations/Augusta%20Investor%20Presentation%20January%202012.pdf
From their Financial Report:
“Mineralization also is known to occur in the Broadtop Butte, Copper World and Peach-Elgin deposits on the Rosemont Property, which could potentially add to the total mineral resource base of the Rosemont area…. A base case mining pit shell generated at metal prices of $1.75/lb Cu, $15.00/lb Mo and $10.00/oz Ag and anticipated operating costs was used to design an ultimate pit for mineral reserve estimation and subsequent mine planning.” (pg. 24) www.augustaresource.com/Theme/Augusta/files/doc_financials/AIFMarch292011.pdf
Just how many jobs are there going to be?
- Their 2011 financial report states 1,000 indirect jobs, and 450 mining jobs.
- Their webpage states 1,700 indirect jobs, and 406 direct jobs
- The DEIS states 2,400 jobs (during construction), and 350 to 480 annual jobs
- The Forest Service states 1,600 indirect jobs in their presentation in the hearings
Twenty-nine reasons they can fail financially —even if they were to be permitted. In their own words from Augusta Resource Corporation's Annual Information Form to stockholders for year 2010, dated March 29, 2011
No. 26 and No. 27 (page regarding "conflicts of interest" and indemnity and protection of officers and directors.
Here's another reason!! They don't know how to calculate copper content! Drill samples go from 1.32/1.57 to 0.45/0.17 in five years??
Freeman's Comments at Green Valley hearing: Who would the American owners of the National Forest be doing business with? Augusta Resource/Rosemont's record is questionable.
Rosemont denied air quality permit by Pima County Environmental Quality
Army Corp: PUBLIC NOTICE: Proposed Rosemont Open Pit Copper Mine
Project Name: Proposed Rosemont Open Pit Copper Mine
Applicant: Rosemont Copper Company
Water body: Barrel Canyon watershed including Wasp, McCleary, and Trail Canyon
Comment Period: December 6, 2011 – January 5, 2012
100 economists urge Obama to protect more public lands—The West's public lands contribute to our economic well being in a variety of ways, including resource extraction and recreation. These activities can and must coexist with expanding protections for America's world-class natural amenities.
The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation releases report: The Economics Associated with
Outdoor Recreation, Natural Resources Conservation and Historic Preservation in the United States
Cultural Considerations on Public Lands:
Archelogical site of Hohokam includes ball court
with Chairman Ned Norris, Tohono O'odham Nation
and Bill Doelle, President, Center for Desert Archeology
Thanks to Green Valley photographer, Murray Bolesta
The truth about jobs: 355 unfilled mining jobs in Arizona—where are the applicants?
Augusta Resource claims they will have 400 direct jobs and 1700 indirect jobs. Give us a list of the 1700 jobs!!--or whatever number you are using this month!!
The truth about Augusta Resource Corp. being in business for 75 years and never has mined?
The Company was incorporated on January 14, 1937 by Articles of Incorporation Letters Patent pursuant to the Ontario Business Corporations Act under the name Hol-Lac Gold Mines, Limited. In 1985, after a period of dormancy, the Company began actively pursuing interests in mining properties. On July 3, 1997, the Company changed its name to Augusta Resource Corporation and on June 28, 1999 the Company was continued under section 187 of the Canada Business Corporations Act.
[See Corporate Structure, page 3 of 2010 Annual Report]
More on Augusta Resource Corporation (also doing business locally as Rosemont Mining Company, SanRita Properties, Dawson Properties, Karnarco Company). They claim to have acquired three properties: Guadalupe y Calvo, Mexico and Blue Moon Metals, California (2000), Nanavut, Canada (2002). What has happened on those projects? They now say that Rosemont is their sole property.
Augusta Group of Companies
Act Now on Rosemont Mine Environmental Issues: Forest Service has released the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for public comment:
(You don't have to read all these documents. See below to pick out your field of interest)
Executive Summary
Complete DEIS
Appendix with maps and Army Corp. of Engineers 401 permit comments
Mining plan
How to comment Written comments on the DEIS are best submitted electronically by accessing
www.RosemontEIS.US and click on "comment here" in upper left of page.
Info on relevant issues
Important points for making relative comments, thanks to Sky Island Alliance
Ideas for comments on Federal Level and contact list
Forest Service letter on Mining Plan includes points on the need for water analysis in mining region...
Economic Issues: Analyses of Economic Costs of the Proposed Rosemont Copper Project
by THOMAS MICHAEL POWER, PhD, Consulting Economist, Power Consulting
Speak for the Trees
I, Nancy Freeman, counted the number of mature trees that would be destroyed by the Rosemont mining operation. I used this map in a 3 ft. x 4 ft. hard copy and divided it up into 4" squares. I only counted discernable trees, not small blurs of bushes or small trees.
See Rosemont Map
Total numbers of mature trees to be destroyed in our National Forest = 33,000 trees
It was impossible to discern the mature oaks, over a century old, that would be destroyed = several thousand oaks
Please note on Rosemont Map that the mine pit is on Patented mining claims that were purchased by ASARCO for $2.50 an acre. So the pit will be on land that was formerly the Coronado National Forest--in spite of what Augusta claims and was included in the tree count. See map of operation in the Forest Service DEIS Appendix (page 16 in Figures Section) to verify this fact.
Map of patented claims of Rosemont pit
Tree counts at Rosemont conducted by Empire High (Vail) and Walden Grove High (Sahuarita) students
Take a photo tour of Rosemont, compliments of Bob Harris
Check out this reality—51 mines in Arizona on EPA's list
Forest Service Reports on their priority of watershed management
Water and the Forest Service
Today's Challenges and Opportunities: Abundant Clean Water
U. S. Forest Service — An Overview
USGS investigates Watershed Contamination from Hard Rock Mining
Technical Reports on each Environmental Impact: You can choose your area of interest: Air, Biological Resources, Dark Skies, Geology, Palentology, Noise and Vibration, Riparian, Socioeconomics, Environmental, Soils, Reclamation, Transportation, Visual Quality, Water Resources
Comments from Federal and State Agencies on the Draft Enviromental Statement
Do not copy any of these reports, but use the information to inspire your own ideas and personal experiences.
EPA comments on water, air, tailings, reclamation plans
BLM comments on water quality, biological resources
BLM comments on biological resources (con't), endangered species
Preliminary comments from Arizona Game and Fish
Comments from local Environmental Groups
Center for Biological Diversity — Endangered Species
Sky Island Alliance — Comments on the DEIS
Reclamation Bonds Understanding the Issues (the details)
The Coronado National Forest was created for urban recreation — states their website:
After the turn of the century [1900], attention turned to southeastern Arizona's Sky Islands for yet another resource, recreation. As early as the mid-1800's, areas such as Hospital Flat in the Pinaleño Mountains and the town of Oracle in the foothills of the Santa Catalinas were being used as refuges from the heat and malaria of lowland forts. At about the same time that 15 upland areas were designated U. S. Forest Reserves (between 1902 and 1907), residents of burgeoning desert communities began trekking to the mountains to escape the summer heat. Areas such as White House (Madera) Canyon in the Santa Ritas, Columbine in the Pinaleños, and Summerhaven in the Santa Catalinas were among the most popular of these forest retreats. [Note: In 1902, the Santa Rita section was the first forest reserve to be created in this region.]
First Report on proposed Rosemont Mine by Groundwater Awareness League/Delivered to Rep. Raul Grijalva and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords 4/5/2007
Protecting Water in Public Lands by Nancy Freeman, Groundwater Awareness League
Report by Fred Tahse, geologist, Hard Facts, who loved to roam in the Santa Ritas..
TENORM: Scoping comments at Sonoita Transport/Highway Safety
Use of sulfuric acid:
Environmental Impact of Sulfuric Acid Leaching
Sulfuric Acid Spills
Information on Local Water for the Rosemont Project:
Rosemont claims rights to surface water meant for plants and wildlife in a national forest region!!
Questa Spring
Barrel Canyon
McCleary Canyon
Wasp Canyon
Rosemont Spring
Two unnamed springs
Rosemont outlines how they can take all the groundwater they want in an arid region
also see YouTube videos —
Rosemont can use Cienega Conservation Water?
Rosemont tanks up with water
Rosemont wells going dry
Map of water source
Patience—it's a long download
Lists of wells Rosemont has claimed
Water Impact Report
includes Federal Statutes for Groundwater Management
Augusta Recharges CAP water in Avra Valley
Groundwater Awareness League's comments to Corporation Commsion on the Augusta Recharge project: 12/07
Report on use of low-quality CAP water in various scenarios
Report on CAP history and quality issues
General Information on environmental Issues:
Water
Protect water levels in Public Lands
YouTube Commentary on protecting water in public lands
Soil
Air
Chemicals
Radioactive Materials
Reclamation
Good lighting is necessary at mines
The Native Americans are not the only ones laid to rest in the Santa Ritas
Webpage of 2009-2011 Original Webpage 2003-2008
Website is a project of Groundwater Awareness League, a 501 c(3) educational non-profit, protecting water in Arizona!
If you have any questions or need any clarifications on grass-roots mining activism, don't hesitate to contact us:
Nancy Freeman
Nancy [@] g-a-l.info
520/398-4340
Send donations to Groundwater Awareness League, P. O. Box 934, Green Valley, AZ 85622
You will receive a receipt for a tax deductible donation. Tax ID:
Disclaimer:
Our intention is to provide accurate data and information. Every attempt has been made to do so. If anyone finds any inaccuracy, please contact us and we will remove or correct the data immediately.
Fair use notice:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, and social justice issues.. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only. The information on this site does not constitute health, legal or technical advice.
If it is our stuff (including photos) or from public records—use it freely
|